GLOBAL ROUTE DIRECTORY

VPN Servers and Route Directory

Choose a route by destination, connection method, and intended use. GFVPN covers 90+ countries / 200+ routes, including IEPL, relay, and direct connections.

  • Unlimited devices
  • No email address required
  • 30-day money-back guarantee
Region Index ROUTES READY
90+ countries covered
200+ routes available

Route names describe the exit region and connection method. The logged-in route directory determines the options currently available.

COVERAGE 90+ countries / 200+ routes
PLATFORMS Windows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux
DEVICES Unlimited devices
ROUTE TABLE

Browse Routes by Region

The table lists representative cities, connection methods, and streaming compatibility. It provides a starting point for route selection, not a complete list of available cities. The full directory covers 90+ countries / 200+ routes; after logging in, you can view the specific options available to your account.

Country / Region City Route Type Streaming Support
Asia-Pacific
Japan Tokyo IEPL Supported
Japan Osaka Relay Supported
Hong Kong, China Hong Kong IEPL Supported
Singapore Singapore IEPL Supported
South Korea Seoul Relay Supported
Taiwan, China Taipei Direct Platform dependent
Australia Sydney Direct Platform dependent
North America
United States Los Angeles Relay Supported
United States San Jose Direct Platform dependent
United States New York Direct Supported
Canada Vancouver Relay Supported
Canada Toronto Direct Platform dependent
Europe
United Kingdom London Relay Supported
Germany Frankfurt Direct Platform dependent
France Paris Direct Supported
Netherlands Amsterdam Relay Supported
Switzerland Zurich Direct Platform dependent
Other Regions
United Arab Emirates Dubai Relay Platform dependent
South Africa Johannesburg Direct Platform dependent
Brazil São Paulo Direct Platform dependent
DIRECTORY NOTE

Route availability may change with maintenance and traffic scheduling. City names indicate the exit region and should not be used alone to judge connection quality. A more reliable approach is to compare the destination region, route type, and actual use case together.

ROUTE CLASSES

Differences Between IEPL, Relay, and Direct Connections

Route types describe the general way data is organized from the local entry point to the target exit. They differ in resource costs, path control, and suitable use cases, but the name alone cannot replace real-world connection testing. Choose based on the task first rather than chasing a particular label.

IEPL Dedicated

IEPL: Controlled international routing

IEPL connections typically use dedicated, enterprise-grade international resources to organize the transfer path between the entry and exit points. Compared with connections that rely entirely on public network routing, they offer greater control over path changes across international segments and suit use cases that require sustained connectivity, video conferencing, remote collaboration, or long-running data transfers.

Dedicated resources generally cost more to build and maintain than standard connections, so they are best reserved for important tasks. The destination must still match the service: choose a Japan exit for Japanese services, or a Singapore exit for systems hosted there. Route type addresses how traffic is carried; exit region addresses content location and proximity. Neither replaces the other.

Best for Remote work, sustained connections, critical tasks
RELAY Relay

Relay routes: an additional routing layer between entry and exit

A relay route does not connect the device directly to the final exit. Instead, it first reaches a suitable access point, then travels through an intermediate link to the target region. Its main value is added routing flexibility: when the direct path from the local network to a distant exit is less suitable, the relay layer can use a better entry point or transmission direction.

This approach suits everyday browsing, streaming, AI Tools, and switching between regional services. Relays require additional route and scheduling resources, so their cost typically falls between dedicated and standard direct connections. Rather than repeatedly chasing city names, keep the target region fixed and choose the most stable-performing relay within that region.

Best for Everyday access, Streaming, AI Tools
DIRECT Direct

Direct routes: a simple path for a defined region

A direct route connects the device to the target exit without an additional relay layer. Its structure is simpler and suits clear destination requirements, such as checking a webpage in a specific region, changing exit regions, or using it as a backup while dedicated or relay routes are under maintenance.

Direct performance is more easily affected by the local network, public international routing, and remote access conditions, so “direct” alone does not indicate quality. If both direct and relay routes are available in the same region, start with direct for ordinary browsing. If long-lived connections fluctuate, video playback stutters, or file transfers fail, compare it with a relay or IEPL route.

Best for Everyday browsing, region switching, backup connections
COST LOGIC

Cost Differences Come from Route Resources, Not Name Length

Dedicated routes require more stable international transport resources and ongoing maintenance. Relays require additional entry points, forwarding resources, and scheduling capacity, while direct routes mainly depend on the target exit and public network path. Different resource requirements affect operating costs, but a higher cost does not mean a route is faster in every situation.

Choose according to task priority: consider path control first for critical work connections, confirm content region and compatibility for streaming, and start with a direct or relay route in the same region for ordinary web access. Reserving premium routes for tasks that truly need them is usually more sensible than keeping every application on one route.

SELECTION GUIDE

Choose Routes by Use Case

Use a consistent order: destination region, task, route type, then connection testing. First identify where the service is hosted, then assess the task’s needs for persistent connectivity and regional recognition, and only then switch among candidate routes in the same region.

Everyday Browsing

For reading webpages, using online documents, or handling light information tasks, start with a region close to the target service. If the content has no specific regional requirement, try an Asia-Pacific relay or direct route first to avoid unnecessary cross-region paths.

Browsing rarely requires staying on one city indefinitely. If page responses become inconsistent, first change the route type within the same region instead of jumping to a distant exit. This makes it easier to tell whether the issue comes from the route or the destination website.

Recommended order Same-region relay → same-region direct

Streaming

For streaming, content region matters more than the route name. Choose a Japan exit for Japanese content and a US exit for US content. Account location, content rights, and platform policies can also affect results, so the support status in the route table is a candidate signal, not a guarantee.

After connecting, open the target platform to confirm its catalog before starting playback. If the catalog is wrong, check the exit region first. If playback is unstable, switch between relay and IEPL within the same region. Avoid changing both region and route type at once, or it will be difficult to identify what helped.

Recommended order Target region → support status → route type

AI Tools

AI Tools often involve web sessions, long responses, file uploads, and sustained requests. Choose a region where the target service is available, then try a relay or IEPL route first. If the page opens but conversations disconnect, keep the region unchanged and adjust only the route type to reduce frequent changes to the account environment.

Before starting a long task, complete sign-in and a basic request test, then upload files or begin sustained work. When several devices are in use, assign exits by task. GFVPN supports unlimited devices, but each device should still use a route suited to its destination.

Recommended order Available region → relay → IEPL

Gaming Connections

Choose an exit based on the game server region. Confirm where the game service is hosted, then select a route in the same or a nearby region. Login, matchmaking, voice chat, and gameplay data may use different services, so reaching the account page does not mean the entire session is ready.

If the connection is unstable, compare relay and direct routes within the same region. Avoid changing exits repeatedly during an active session, as the session may need to reconnect. For sustained team play or long connections, consider IEPL first and keep a same-region relay as an alternative.

Recommended order Game region → nearby exit → same-region alternative

Remote Work

Work tasks often include meetings, document sync, code repositories, business dashboards, and file transfers, so session continuity matters. Choose an exit based on the region of the company system or collaboration platform, then prioritize IEPL or relay routes. If business systems are hosted in different regions, configure separate client rules.

Before an important meeting or transfer, run a basic connectivity check and stop unnecessary high-bandwidth tasks. If a problem occurs, note the current region and route type before switching to a same-region backup. This helps restore access quickly and gives support staff a clear description of the issue.

Recommended order Business region → IEPL → same-region relay
DECISION METHOD

How to Evaluate Routes

The route directory defines the available choices, not a single answer. Local access conditions, the target service region, application connection behavior, and time of use all affect performance. A consistent testing sequence is more useful than memorizing one route name.

  1. Identify the Target Region First

    For content platforms, check the content region; for business systems, check the deployment region; for games, check the server zone. Without a clear target, route comparisons have no consistent baseline.

  2. Keep the Region Fixed, Then Compare Types

    Compare IEPL, relay, and direct routes within the same region first. Change only one condition at a time so you can tell whether the difference comes from the connection method rather than the exit region or content catalog.

  3. Test with Real Tasks

    A webpage loading only confirms basic connectivity. For streaming, verify the catalog and playback; for work, test meetings and file sync; for AI Tools, test sustained conversations and file tasks.

  4. Keep a Same-Region Backup

    After choosing a primary route, select a backup option in the same region with a different connection method. During maintenance or local network changes, you can switch directly without searching for another exit region.

REGION COVERAGE

Coverage Region Index

GFVPN’s complete route directory covers 90+ countries / 200+ routes. The region labels below summarize common access directions; the user panel determines the specific cities, connection methods, and options currently available.

Japan Hong Kong, China Singapore South Korea Taiwan, China Australia United States Canada United Kingdom Germany France Netherlands Switzerland United Arab Emirates South Africa Brazil
PLATFORM ACCESS

The Same Route Selection Logic Works Across Platforms

Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Linux can all use the same destination-region and route-type criteria. Client downloads are available in the user panel; log in to access the client and subscription.

Get the Client
ACCOUNT RULE

Keep Registration Minimal

No email address is required; create an account with a username and password. Plans support unlimited devices, making it easy to configure separate access routes on computers, tablets, and other supported platforms.

Start Free